> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.raisepill.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Strategist agent

> How Strategist ranks opportunities by fit, effort, and expected value, and suggests counterfactual moves to maximize your expected capital raised.

<Note>
  **One job:** Tell you what to pursue and why, ranked by real expected value.
</Note>

The Strategist studies winning applications from RaisePill's database of awarded grants and learns what actually correlates with success. It takes Scout's raw opportunity list and turns it into a ranked action plan.

## How Strategist ranks opportunities

Every opportunity is scored on three dimensions:

* **Fit** — how well your project matches the call requirements (from Scout)
* **Effort** — estimated hours to produce a competitive application
* **Expected value** — grant amount × win probability

The final rank is `fit × (expected value / effort)` — the best return for your time.

## Counterfactual recommendations

Strategist doesn’t just rank. It suggests moves that would shift your odds:

> *"Add a university partner → +18% win probability on EIC Accelerator."*\
> *"Slow outreach this week → -€280k expected value vs. current pace."*

These surface in the [Analytics](/app/analytics) view and occasionally in [Tasks](/app/tasks) when an action is time-sensitive.

## What Strategist learns from

* RaisePill’s database of previously awarded EU grants (including 14 winning EIC applications)
* Your own past applications (wins and losses) once you’ve been on the platform
* Pattern signals: evaluator rubrics, section weighting, common failure modes

## Where you see Strategist's output

* [**Analytics → Counterfactuals**](/app/analytics) — strategic recommendations with impact estimates
* [**Radar**](/app/radar) — opportunity ranking informed by Strategist's scores
* [**Tasks**](/app/tasks) — strategic decisions that require your input